On 12/02/14 15:18, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > However, I hacked together the patch below, which "fixes" the issue for > 96m and dss fclk. It sets the clock parents so that the x2 clocks are > skipped, and makes the x2 clock nodes compatible with "unused", making > them effectively disappear. I only verified dss fclk, so Christoph, can > you verify the 96m clock? Aaand the hack patch I sent is crap... We can't skip the x2 clock path, as the dpll4_mNx2_ck clock nodes handle enable/disable bit, which is present on 3630 also. I think the best and simplest way to fix this is by setting the multiplier in the dpll4_mNx2_mul_ck nodes to 1. I don't know why I didn't think of it yesterday. I have a bunch of other patches needed to get the clocks right, so I'll send a series separately a bit later today. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
