On Thursday 04 December 2008, Pillai, Manikandan wrote: > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c > > > it doesn't make sense to build this file if you don't have twl4030 in > > the board. Better to have something like mmc-tps6235x.c or something > > like that. > > [Pillai, Manikandan] This would be provided in a latter patch that > provides support for MMC1. I have created another file mmc-pr785.c in > this patch. I am currently testing and shall send it soon. Note that current plans for mmc-twl4030.c include converting it to use the regulator framework after the current stuff get submitted for mainline. That should be the last remnant of the twl4030-specific support in that driver glue. Ideally there will be no need for an mmc-pr785 ... so maybe mmc-twl4030.c should get renamed (again!) to be generic. Or better yet, your work for pr785 can produce that fully genericized version. :) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
