Hi Paul, From: "ext Paul Walmsley" <paul@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] clk: introduce clk_associate Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:13:49 -0600 (MDT) > Hello Hiroshi, > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > > > I understood both points you explained below, while I still think that > > standardizing clock names may be a little bit rigid. > > Perhaps you can help me understand - are you referring to the use of the > TRM clocks, rather than creating a custom clock for each device driver? > Or are you referring to the clock names used in the omap_clk_associate() > calls? This has been already solved since you suggested just to use more shorter logical name, "ick" and "fck". It would be much cleaner;) Hiroshi DOYU -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
