Re: [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] clk: introduce clk_associate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Hiroshi,

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:

> I understood both points you explained below, while I still think that
> standardizing clock names may be a little bit rigid.

Perhaps you can help me understand - are you referring to the use of the 
TRM clocks, rather than creating a custom clock for each device driver?  
Or are you referring to the clock names used in the omap_clk_associate() 
calls?

> Thank you for your review and comments.

You're welcome,

- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux