* David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> [080831 14:36]: > On Friday 29 August 2008, Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto wrote: > > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:35:15 +0300 > > Subject: [PATCH] Adding IOCTL command to get slave private data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/media/v4l2-int-device.h | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Seeing that series of patches from Felipe makes me wonder why > these patches shouldn't go *first* to the V4L list ... to help > avoid letting code sit for a long time in the OMAP tree without > going upstream. > > This particular patch for example is not OMAP-specific. > > And in general, the relevant review team for a V4L driver > (the rest of this series) is the V4L team not the OMAP team. > And if this driver passes their review, why not just merge > to mainline right away? Yeah, this series should go via V4L list. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
