On Friday 29 August 2008, Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto wrote: > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:35:15 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] Adding IOCTL command to get slave private data. > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/media/v4l2-int-device.h | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Seeing that series of patches from Felipe makes me wonder why these patches shouldn't go *first* to the V4L list ... to help avoid letting code sit for a long time in the OMAP tree without going upstream. This particular patch for example is not OMAP-specific. And in general, the relevant review team for a V4L driver (the rest of this series) is the V4L team not the OMAP team. And if this driver passes their review, why not just merge to mainline right away? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
