On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:24:11PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > They'll need to be in nicely reviewable chunks ... I remember seeing > some DaVinci patches in late 2006 which broke on TUSB6010 silicon, > for example. > > DMA in particular could really stand some cleanup. Having four > different chunks of DMA code -- RX/TX vs Host/Peripheral -- with > ifdeffery for multiple DMA engines is ... chaotic. Yeah, after the debugfs changes I plan to clean up those. Might take a while due to internal tasks > > I discussed with Kevin on the DaVinci Git tree and Filipe here and they recommended that > > I take the changes to linux-usb, linux-omap tree (w.r.t musb changes) to get a wider > > audience for review and acceptance. > > > > Kevin would then pull in the changes as part of his regular synch ups. > > I think the plan should be to have various SOC-specific trees (DaVinci, > OMAP, Blackfin, etc) stop hosting MUSB-specific patches. They should > be pushed up to mainline ASAP ... the linux-omap tree should stop being > the place where the latest MUSB code sits. It's not anymore, we Cc that list so interested people might also take a look on the patches, since we pushed musb code via Greg's queue, linux-usb is the place for musb discussion. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
