On Thursday 21 August 2008, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote: > why don't rely on an endpoint interrupt which is generated > after a USB transaction is complete? That's what I thought *was* working a couple years ago... I take it that something broke since then? Or is this a corner case which didn't always work right? I'm not sure this would be appropriate for mainline until the DaVinci code can run there. There are a bunch of arch/arm/mach-davinci updates needed first. I know Kevin was looking at some of this, but just now I think enabling MUSB on a 2.6.27-rc4 DaVinci config means a broken build. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
