RE: [RFC][DRAFT] TODO list for TI DSP BRIDGE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hiroshi,

> I sent some patches based on the above suggestion.
>
>   http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=121922597019873&w=2
>   http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=121922593919766&w=2
>
> I think that this virtual clock may allow any arbitrary combination of
> clocks and it may be possible to have multiple hierarchy of virtual
> clocks like:
>
>    dsp_clocks
>    |
>    |-- peripheral_clocks
>    |     |
>    |     |-- gpt5
>    |     |    |- gpt5_ick
>    |     |    `- gpt5_fck
>    |
>    |-- ....
>    ..
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.

A few quick comments:

- First off, I do like the idea of virtual clocks for grouping.  I did do this for OMAP2 for completely internal and dependent root clocks.  I also thought it might be nice to extend clock frame work to allow external clock registration (say for a codec chip).  In our local tree I did even add it.  One main issue was the internal clock structure is supposed to be opaque and you need to set internals to add a clock node.

- I worry a bit about grouping of internal resources which may be allocated differently per implementation.  Perhaps a board specific resource can handle it, but you've not included that in the patch.

- Where is the board specific side of this call?  I see clock calls added to clock.c but not resources added to mach-omap2/xyz-board.c.

- You're not preserving the enable error path back to the virtual clock.  A recovery from a failure would be messy.

- Will these clocks always be handled as a group?  If I were to try and optimize I might shut down a gpt5 clock individually to allow a PER domain to power off.  The DSP should aggressively be letting go of resource when it doesn't need them to allow power to work.  1 virtual resource with all related clocks would not be right.

If you wanted grouping their might be like DSP-CORE, DSP-Streaming-Audio, Dsp-...  You will want better granularity.  So the enable/disables are effective for power savings.  This is especially true if your not even using say a McBSP and are doing something like JPEG decode.


Regards,
Richard W.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux