RE: [PATCH] Enable SYSOFFMODE use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I would say no, we don't need the CONFIG_SYSOFFMODE option.

One point is if you try an go to 0v on something under and ES2.1 you will end up with crashes after a while.  Some kind of conditional is needed unless we get to drop the non-production chip versions.

Before ES2.1 there is a ROM code bug which will trip up the context restore.

Really, it would be good to schedule some time to kill ES1 support.  The chip is so different its really just baggage.  With cheap and available OMAP3's out there they are really not viable.

As to C state, I'm not sure, just yet.  If we end up with too many of them there is some overhead in determining thresholds, then trying to tweak a governor to choose them smartly?  It's a little while before this code get to that point, but the process seem to be a bit time consuming on internal.

Regards,
Richard W.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux