"ext Madhusudhan Chikkature" <madhu.cr@xxxxxx> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ""Högander" Jouni" <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "ext Felipe Balbi" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:39 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] 34XX: PM: Workaround to disable mmc > > >> "ext Felipe Balbi" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:31:11 +0300, Jouni Hogander >>> <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Current hsmmc is not pm friendly. Disable it because it prevents omap3 >>>> retention >>> >>> Disabling will just hide the bug. Better making it modular >>> and let mmc guys dig on it. >> >> Ok, I can change it, if this set needs to be sent again. I think >> disabling mmc increases visibility of its PM problems. I mean missing >> mmc driver is more visible than missing PM in this case. >> >>> >>> What do you need to make it more pm friendly? >> >> Not to prevent omap retention. > When are you expecting the omap to go into retention? Is it in the > suspend path? I expect it to enter retention when suspending yes. It should also enter retention dynamically. I mean when mpu enters wfi in pm_idle loop. -- Jouni Högander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
