ext Arnaud Patard wrote:
Hello Felipe,
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Paul, what do you think about either keeping that ifdef or modifying
control.h in order to allow some defines and/or functions to be accessed
by OMAP1 ??
I would think that just keeping the #ifdefs is the best thing for now. An
agreed, even if #ifdefs are evil :)
I sent a new patch named "[PATCH] ARCH: OMAP: Fix compile error with
OMAP1" with the solution using #ifdefs.
alternative would be to add null function stubs for
ctrl_{read,write}_reg() for OMAP1, or maybe a function that oopses when
called on an OMAP1 machine. But I doubt it's worth the effort unless
someone wants to work on OMAP1/2 multiboot.
hmm... imho you can forget this option. OMAP1/2 multiboot is not supported
at all afaics. It would be a huge task to allow it.
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Francisco Keppler Silva Alecrim
INdT - OSMRC - Manaus
Core team
Tel : (+55 92) 2126 1017
Mobile: (+55 92) 8803 5462
Skype : keppleralecrim
Jabber: alecrim@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
