> Hello Felipe,
Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> Paul, what do you think about either keeping that ifdef or modifying
>> control.h in order to allow some defines and/or functions to be accessed
>> by OMAP1 ??
>
> I would think that just keeping the #ifdefs is the best thing for now. An
agreed, even if #ifdefs are evil :)
> alternative would be to add null function stubs for
> ctrl_{read,write}_reg() for OMAP1, or maybe a function that oopses when
> called on an OMAP1 machine. But I doubt it's worth the effort unless
> someone wants to work on OMAP1/2 multiboot.
hmm... imho you can forget this option. OMAP1/2 multiboot is not supported
at all afaics. It would be a huge task to allow it.
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
