On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote: >>> I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old kernels. >>> (And, please declare a "Tested-by" tag in the reply mail, if the test >>> is ok). >> >> Sure I have everything set up. Which kernels do I have to test? Was >> commit 136e877 backported? I presume at least stable and some of the >> longterm kernels on https://www.kernel.org/... > > The commit 136e877 was merged to v3.10 and backported to stable trees > of earlier kernels. But, most of earlier stable trees are no longer > maintained. Well maintained trees are the following longterm kernels: > > - 3.4.y (backported commit 136e877) > - 3.10.y > - 3.14.y > > I think these three kernels are worty to be tested. I tested it on all stable kernels including 3.4.x, 3.10.x, 3.14.x. The bug is present in all of them and the patch fixes it. The patch also applies cleanly on all kernels. I sent it again yesterday, and added the Tested-by: tag. br, Andreas Rohner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
