On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:16:46 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote: > On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote: >>>> I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old kernels. >>>> (And, please declare a "Tested-by" tag in the reply mail, if the test >>>> is ok). >>> >>> Sure I have everything set up. Which kernels do I have to test? Was >>> commit 136e877 backported? I presume at least stable and some of the >>> longterm kernels on https://www.kernel.org/... >> >> The commit 136e877 was merged to v3.10 and backported to stable trees >> of earlier kernels. But, most of earlier stable trees are no longer >> maintained. Well maintained trees are the following longterm kernels: >> >> - 3.4.y (backported commit 136e877) >> - 3.10.y >> - 3.14.y >> >> I think these three kernels are worty to be tested. > > I tested it on all stable kernels including 3.4.x, 3.10.x, 3.14.x. The > bug is present in all of them and the patch fixes it. The patch also > applies cleanly on all kernels. I sent it again yesterday, and added the > Tested-by: tag. Thank you. I'll pick up the new patch. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
