On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:11 +0300, Сергей Александров wrote:
> dmesg:
> [53994.254432] NILFS warning: mounting unchecked fs
> [56686.968229] NILFS: recovery complete.
> [56686.969316] segctord starting. Construction interval = 5 seconds,
> CP frequency < 30 seconds
>
> messages:
> Nov 15 10:57:06 router kernel: [53994.254432] NILFS warning: mounting
> unchecked fs
> Nov 15 11:42:02 router kernel: [56686.968229] NILFS: recovery complete.
> Nov 15 11:42:02 router kernel: [56686.969316] segctord starting.
> Construction interval = 5 seconds, CP frequency < 30 seconds
>
> May be there is some kernel config option to get more debug output?
>
I prepared small patch (please, find in attachment). This patch simply
adds several debug messages into recovery module. I suggest to apply the
patch on your NILFS2 driver and try to mount again in the issue
environment. I hope that these debug messages can give more information
about issue on your side.
The patch uses pr_debug() call. Please, see
Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt for more details.
To be honest, I don't test the patch yet. So, if you will have any
troubles, please, e-mail to me.
With the best regards,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
> As for fsck, I have not found it in git public repo, so where can I
> get the latest version?
> --------------------------------------------------
From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs: add debug messages for recovery module
This patch simply adds several pr_debug() messages for debugging recovery code functioning.
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nilfs2/recovery.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c b/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c
index f1626f5..cb5c0c7 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c
@@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ static int nilfs_prepare_segment_for_recovery(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
int err;
int i;
+ pr_debug("NILFS: nilfs_prepare_segment_for_recovery\n");
+ pr_debug("NILFS: ns_segnum %lld, ns_nextnum %lld\n",
+ nilfs->ns_segnum, nilfs->ns_nextnum);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: ri_segnum %lld, ri_nextnum %lld\n",
+ ri->ri_segnum, ri->ri_nextnum);
+
segnum[0] = nilfs->ns_segnum;
segnum[1] = nilfs->ns_nextnum;
segnum[2] = ri->ri_segnum;
@@ -602,6 +608,11 @@ static int nilfs_do_roll_forward(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
segnum = nilfs_get_segnum_of_block(nilfs, pseg_start);
nilfs_get_segment_range(nilfs, segnum, &seg_start, &seg_end);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: nilfs_do_roll_forward\n");
+ pr_debug("NILFS: pseg_start %lld, seg_seq %lld\n", pseg_start, seg_seq);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: segnum %lld\n", segnum);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: seg_start %lld, seg_end %lld\n", seg_start, seg_end);
+
while (segnum != ri->ri_segnum || pseg_start <= ri->ri_pseg_start) {
brelse(bh_sum);
bh_sum = nilfs_read_log_header(nilfs, pseg_start, &sum);
@@ -705,6 +716,8 @@ static void nilfs_finish_roll_forward(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
struct buffer_head *bh;
int err;
+ pr_debug("NILFS: nilfs_finish_roll_forward\n");
+
if (nilfs_get_segnum_of_block(nilfs, ri->ri_lsegs_start) !=
nilfs_get_segnum_of_block(nilfs, ri->ri_super_root))
return;
@@ -750,6 +763,8 @@ int nilfs_salvage_orphan_logs(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
if (ri->ri_lsegs_start == 0 || ri->ri_lsegs_end == 0)
return 0;
+ pr_debug("NILFS: nilfs_salvage_orphan_logs\n");
+
err = nilfs_attach_checkpoint(sb, ri->ri_cno, true, &root);
if (unlikely(err)) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -831,6 +846,10 @@ int nilfs_search_super_root(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
cno = nilfs->ns_last_cno;
segnum = nilfs_get_segnum_of_block(nilfs, pseg_start);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: nilfs_search_super_root\n");
+ pr_debug("NILFS: pseg_start %lld, seg_seq %lld\n", pseg_start, seg_seq);
+ pr_debug("NILFS: cno %lld, segnum %lld\n", cno, segnum);
+
/* Calculate range of segment */
nilfs_get_segment_range(nilfs, segnum, &seg_start, &seg_end);
--
1.7.9.5
