Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 Jul 2016, at 4:22, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:03:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
This debug output is identical for every cycle of the loop. Have to
stop for the
day.. more tomorrow.

Ben


Duh??? It???s this patch: pNFS: Fix post-layoutget error handling in
pnfs_update_layout()
We have to pass through fatal errors??? I???ll fix it.

That's indeed fixed it up, and generic/207 passes now.  Thanks!

So I spoke too soon in my last mail, generic/207 still fails for me
with Trond's linux-next tree, although much later in the test now.

Does it include the changes that are supposed to fix the issue?

It should -- the v2 that fixed 207 for me is 56b38a1f7c781519eef09c1668a3c97ea911f86b, the first version was e35c2a0b3cd062a8941d21511719391b64437427, I think. I'll test again too.

Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux