Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] NFS: Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:59:09AM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Actually... The problem might be that a previous attribute update is
> marking the attribute cache as being revalidated. Does the following
> patch help?

It doesn't.  Also with your most recent linux-next branch the test
now cause the systems to OOM with or without your patch (with mine it's
still fine).  I tested with your writeback branch from about two or
three days ago before, and with that + your patch it also 'just fails'
and doesn't OOM.  Looks like whatever causes the bug also creates
a temporarily memory leak when combined with recent changes from your
tree, most likely something from the pnfs branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux