Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:03:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> > > This debug output is identical for every cycle of the loop. Have to
> > > stop for the
> > > day.. more tomorrow.
> > > 
> > > Ben
> > > 
> > 
> > Duh??? It???s this patch: pNFS: Fix post-layoutget error handling in
> > pnfs_update_layout()
> > We have to pass through fatal errors??? I???ll fix it.
> 
> That's indeed fixed it up, and generic/207 passes now.  Thanks!

So I spoke too soon in my last mail, generic/207 still fails for me
with Trond's linux-next tree, although much later in the test now.

Does it include the changes that are supposed to fix the issue?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux