[PATCH 2/2] NFS: Flush reclaim writes using FLUSH_COND_STABLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If there are already writes queued up for commit, then don't flush
just this page even if it is a reclaim issue.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/write.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index 7a4fe7d82e65..1ea35f88eadb 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int wb_priority(struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	if (wbc->for_reclaim)
-		return FLUSH_HIGHPRI | FLUSH_STABLE;
+		return FLUSH_HIGHPRI | FLUSH_COND_STABLE;
 	if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
 		ret = FLUSH_COND_STABLE;
 	return ret;
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux