[PATCH 1/2] NFS: Background flush should not be low priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Background flush is needed in order to satisfy the global page limits.
Don't subvert by reducing the priority.
This should also address a write starvation issue that was reported by
Neil Brown.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/write.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index 7b9316406930..7a4fe7d82e65 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -247,8 +247,6 @@ static int wb_priority(struct writeback_control *wbc)
 		return FLUSH_HIGHPRI | FLUSH_STABLE;
 	if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
 		ret = FLUSH_COND_STABLE;
-	if (wbc->for_kupdate || wbc->for_background)
-		ret |= FLUSH_LOWPRI;
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux