Hello Steve, Thanks for your reply. I was wondering if the fix is required in the man page by just adding this option for nfs mount, or there is a need to fix the mount system call. In either case I can send the patch. Please advise which would be appropriate. Thanks Abhijit On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 03/24/2015 08:19 AM, Abhijit Pal wrote: >> Hello linux-nfs team, >> >> Thank you for giving your attention and time to my query. >> >> Wanted to get an insight about a problem regarding nfs mount using the >> system call mount(2) which was reported by one of the user in >> "StackOverflow". >> >> The URL for the problem statement and the accepted solution is: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28350912/nfs-mount-system-call-in-linux >> >> After going through the kernel code(v 3.18.6), I have posted an answer >> which worked for the user and was accepted. Was thinking if you can >> guide me if the accepted solution is indeed a bug or not. And if the >> solution is acceptable would request you to kindly let me know the >> process, so that I can send a patch for updating the nfs(5) man page. >> > Mail the patch to this list following these guidelines > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > steved. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
