On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:58:20PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote: > The questions is just wondering how the transition method could be, but > if we have to do the changes for vendor, that sounds like a tough job... I would see changing how the information is represented in the struct as a follow on issue. The first patch should go through and replace all direct access to the link layer/transport/etc with an appropriately narrow is_XX() test like Doug was suggesting. That means looking at each code site and determining what it needs, making a is_XX for it and a kdoc describing exactly what is needed for the test to return true. The follow on patch can then rework the is_XX and drop the link layer/transport stuff.. Some ideas for is_XX: IB compatible SA QP0 SMP mechanism IB SMP format OPA SMP format QP1 GMP mechanism IB compatible CM GID addressing IP/IPv6 addressing Ethernet VLAN ... Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
