On 11/11/2014 05:27 PM, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > I don't think so. Right now users know that if they don't use a minor > version then they'll be getting a v4.0 mount. I think we should keep > this behavior so we don't accidentally break people's configuration. > This would be inconsistent and there for unexpected. What you suggest is: * if user specifies no version then start with 4.1, work down to supported version * if user specifies major=4 only try 4.0 * if user specifies major.minor only try major.minor I think a more expect behavior would be: * if user specifies no version then start with 4.1, work down to supported version * if user specifies major=4 start with 4.1 til 4.0 * if user specifies major.minor only try major.minor The preferred (implicit) minor is 1 in all cases The question is did users of major=4 meant 4.0 and were lazy to type ".0" or did they mean "don't try 3 or 2" Current system compatibility is already changing by moving all case 1 above from 4.0 to 4.1 by the next yum update. I think it would be reasonable to also change case 2. And have a consistent semantics. > Anna > Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
