On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:36:48AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Just out of curiosity, though, why does XFS update i_version on every > block allocation? For NFSv4 compatibility, it really should suffice > for it to just do the update once in the above case. Did Lustre have > more stringent requirements? It's literatlly updated everytime inode metadata changes. Dave implemented this, so I don't know the real rationale behind it. I don't think anyone sane cares about Lustre ever, certainly not for XFS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html