On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:29:06PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > I picked gfs2 as the initial use case for simplicity and ease of review. > If there is a rough consensus that it's useless and not worthy of inclusion > then the one we care about the most is exofs that has a more complete pnfs > implementation. This was in reference to file layout implementation details, so exofs isn't a contender there. As far as exofs is concerned a pnfs implementation based on it has just as much toy status as the current gfs2 one. While the pnfs side of it might as well be a lot better, a filesystem that lacks all the integrity and scalability features developed in the last 30 years can't be considered more than a proof of concept. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
