On 2013-10-03 12:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:02:27AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: >> Just that this is dlm specific logic. >> For example, using dlm_ino_hash() in nfsd4_pnfs_dlm_layoutget(). >> Or even knowing that >> layout->lg_stripe_type = STRIPE_SPARSE; >> assumes knowledge of the underlying cluster fs implementation. > > Which in-tree or soon in-tree filesystem do you care about? And why > don't we see pnfs support for it submitted instead of the fairly useless > gfs2 support? I picked gfs2 as the initial use case for simplicity and ease of review. If there is a rough consensus that it's useless and not worthy of inclusion then the one we care about the most is exofs that has a more complete pnfs implementation. Benny > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
