Re: [PATCH] VFS: Suppress automount on [l]stat, [l]getxattr, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LOOKUP_OPEN flags an open intent and will therefore have side-effects on
> NFSv4.

Yes, and the actual downside for that is exactly what?

If you are talking about the bind mount issue, then what is the
downside with saying "we want the same stronger consistency guarantees
as for a 'file open' operation"?

Especially since we know that the side effects of the LOOKUP_FOLLOW
approach are MUCH BIGGER, and have already caused real complaints from
actual real users.

In comparison with those real downsides, why the heck are people
complaining about LOOKUP_DIRECTORY or LOOKUP_OPEN?

Seriously.

Let me repeat: what are the ACTUAL REAL DOWNSIDES?

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux