On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:30:49PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: >> I would greatly appreciate it I can get a reply from NFS41 server >> implementers out there on the subject of whether or not the following >> feature are (a) currently implemented by your server, (b) will be >> implemented soon (1year), (c) having interest in being implemented >> within the next few years and (d) are so low in priority that could be >> said: will never be implemented. > > This could change depending on interest, of course, but: > >> volatile handles >> named attributes > > Probably both (d). > >> directory delegations >> SSV > > I'm guessing (c) or (d). (I'd be happier if SSV were a higher priority, > but oh well.) > >> trunking (session or clientid) > > (b) > >> segmented file layouts >> >> recall of file layouts >> cb_notify_deviceid > > Not sure. > >> cb_getattr > > (c) > >> cb_recall_slot >> cb_notify_lock > > Probably both (c). > > This list doesn't necessarily get you anyone other than linux > implementors, so you may want to ask on nfsv4@xxxxxxxx or ask people at > the bakeathon. Thank you Bruce. Thomas Haynes has also pointed this mistake out to me and I posted to the ietf list. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
