On Apr. 29, 2010, 21:12 +0300, Tom Haynes <tom.haynes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/29/10 03:44 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: >> Sorin, regarding possible dates, if possible let's try to avoid a conflict >> with the SNIA Storage Developer Conference 2010 that's scheduled for >> September 20 - 23, 2010 in Santa Clara (http://www.snia.org/events/storage-developer2010/) >> >> I suggest we schedule within one of two windows: Sept 7-19 or Sept 24-Oct 7. >> The week before the SNIA conference (week of 9/13) or right after >> (9/27) would work best as far as travelling goes. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Benny >> >> > > Benny, > > How many people from outside the US will be going to both > SNIA and the BAT? Two form Panasas > > We haven't had this overlap hit us in the past and I would > prefer we not be so afraid of it now. > > I also would prefer that we not meet in Sept and try to > keep the dates in October. > > My reasoning on that is we want to keep a 4 month gap > between this event and both the prior and the cthon. > With just a 3 month gap from Ann Arbor, there may not > be much of anything significantly different. Makes sense. > > And if there is not much new to test or if we don't find > new issues, then the different management chains might > start to question why we are spending so much travel > budget. Absolutely, and 4 months of development should provide us with some substantial changes to (re)test. Benny > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
