On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:42:18PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote: > > > J. Bruce Fields: > > Our current NFS implementation just isn't designed to be able to shut > > down some components while leaving others running. > > Really? But the lockd started with nfs service start, but not nfslock service. > And, lockd can't stop with statd at the same time. > Sometimes, the lockd will not synchronous with statd. Maybe this problem is a good example. I'm sorry, I still don't understand. Please take a look at section 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 of the nfs-utils README file. That describes the order in which servers should be started and stopped. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
