Hi Lukáš,Could you point out what is "broken" with the existing code, and wherein this patch that is fixed?
I can see the value of a preferred realm. Would it also be a goodidea to use the machine's default realm if no preferred realm isspecified?
I'd like to get other's opinions on the addition of the timeout parameter.
It seems this should really be three separate patches: 1) the fix forthe "broken" code, 2) adding the preferred realm, 3) adding thecontext timeout.
I don't have time to look any closer today, hopefully tomorrow.
K.C.
2008/6/24 Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxx>:> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:33:38PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:>> Sorry I must have missed the posting... would you mind sending me a pointer>> to those posting?>> as promissed, my patch is attached. hope you like it :)>> --> Lukáš Hejtmánek>˙ôčş{.nÇ+?ˇ?Ž??+%?Ë˙ąéÝśĽ?w˙ş{.nÇ+?ˇĽ?{ąţwěţ)í?ćčw* jgŹą¨ ś????ݢj˙žŤţGŤ?é˙˘¸ ˘ˇŚj:+v?¨?wčjŘmś?˙ţř Żů ŽwĽţ?ŕţfŁ˘ˇh??â?ú˙?ŮĽ
