At 01:21 PM 5/19/2008, Chuck Lever wrote: >I think that's why this patch was originally rejected. Trond didn't >like the fact that I said IETF standard, but I don't recall the exact >details. Ok, I guess I'm with you, but don't have a strong issue with it. Again, I'm mainly just glad the NFS_FS option doesn't say to use CODA instead. EXPERIMENTAL and Sun's protocol - at least it's moving up in the pecking order. :-) Tom. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
