At 10:16 PM 5/17/2008, Chuck Lever wrote: >Clean up: refresh the help text for Kconfig items related to the NFS >client. Remove obsolete URLs, and make the language consistent among >the options. I like the patch for no other reason than (finally) getting rid of the CODA nasty-gram: >- A superior but less widely used alternative to NFS is provided by >- the Coda file system; see "Coda file system support" below. But I do have a comment - I think calling it "Sun's" protocol is unnecessary. It's an IETF standard, and widely implemented. >+ Choose Y here if you want to access files residing on other >+ computers using Sun's Network File System protocol. To compile >+ this file system support as a module, choose M here: the module >+ will be called nfs. > config NFS_V3 >- bool "Provide NFSv3 client support" >+ bool "NFS client support for NFS version 3" The new option says NFS twice. > depends on NFS_FS > help >- Say Y here if you want your NFS client to be able to speak version >- 3 of the NFS protocol. >+ This option enables support for version 3 of the NFS protocol >+ (RFC 1813) in the kernel's NFS client. And twice again. > config NFS_V4 >- bool "Provide NFSv4 client support (EXPERIMENTAL)" >+ bool "NFS client support for NFS version 4 (EXPERIMENTAL)" > depends on NFS_FS && EXPERIMENTAL Is it necessary to say "(EXPERIMENTAL)"? There are many other kernel options that don't, but in fact are dependent. Tom. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
