Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ BISECTED: rsyslog/imklog: High CPU usage ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:19:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov said:
>
> Not only "__wait_no_timeout(tout) ?:" was wrong, I didn't bother
> to recheck this logic even after I got the "warning: the omitted
> middle operand in ?:" reports.
>
> Sedat, thanks you very much! Any chance you can try the patch below?

I'm not Sedat, but I had the same problem with rsyslog going nuts,
and I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem.  (Had to hand-apply
it, there was some difference of opinion regarding { } on an else)

Feel free to toss on a Tested-By: if this becomes a separate commit...

Attachment: pgpCemPq_LOve.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux