Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ BISECTED: rsyslog/imklog: High CPU usage ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:17 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:19:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov said:
>>
>> Not only "__wait_no_timeout(tout) ?:" was wrong, I didn't bother
>> to recheck this logic even after I got the "warning: the omitted
>> middle operand in ?:" reports.
>>
>> Sedat, thanks you very much! Any chance you can try the patch below?
>
> I'm not Sedat, but I had the same problem with rsyslog going nuts,
> and I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem.  (Had to hand-apply
> it, there was some difference of opinion regarding { } on an else)
>

I am... Legend :-).
Thanks for confirmation!

- Yes, it's you (every day Gmail says this to me) "Sedat" -

> Feel free to toss on a Tested-By: if this becomes a separate commit...
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux