On 06/29, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:30:41 -0700, Randy Dunlap said: > > > + __ret = __wait_no_timeout(tout) ?: (tout) ?: 1; > > Was this trying to do a wait_ho_timeout(!!tout) or something? No, __wait_no_timeout() means that tout == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT. But the logic is wrong, we should return zero in this case. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
