On 04/17/2013 06:34 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > Yes, I am not too worried about arc since it doesn't break anything. > But as you mention it would be better if the whole job could be done > by the same patch. The problem here is the merge order, for me to > address this I need to work after your patches. OK I understand. Since your code touches a lot more stuff, I don't know if the ordering should be governed by this small harmless patch alone :-) > So maybe in the end my > series should be merged at the end of the merge window, and after all > architecture code is merged, to make sure I can address all instances. You are touching a lot of arches anyways so you will have to be after them anyways. Is that right ? Anyhow lets park this patch for now - we can push it in the 3.10-rc cycle. -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
