On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:18:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old > > these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that > > the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests. > Is that a reason to push breakage to them upstream? No. Please take > Paul's patches to fix the breakage which was introduced through your > tree yourself. I've got enough problems this merge window to deal with > without having to add further patches to my tree. Well, I'd expect this stuff to be going via the pxa tree to arm-soc rather than via your tree anyway (which seems to be what's happening at this point) - half the point with arm-soc was to ensure you didn't have to deal with things like this. Quite frankly I thought the fixes had already been applied, they were posted and reviewed in good time for the merge window and the issues weren't being reported in -next any more; had someone asked I'd have applied them as I did with the equivalent stuff for u300. If they were being totally ignored I'd probably have applied them too, though perhaps not.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
