On 12-03-14 04:38 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> commit 737f360d5bef5e01c6cfa755dca0b449a154c1e0 (linux-next)
>>
>> "regulator: Remove support for supplies specified by struct device"
>>
>> deletes the field from the struct, but this platform was still trying
>> to set those fields. Convert them to use the REGULATOR_SUPPLY macro.
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: error: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: error: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: error: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: error: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> [v3: fix arg2 in REGULATOR_SUPPLY to have correct names ]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> index f2c23ea..b6a338b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> @@ -679,14 +679,8 @@ static struct platform_device power_supply = {
>> */
>>
>> static struct regulator_consumer_supply bq24022_consumers[] = {
>> - {
>> - .dev = &gpio_vbus.dev,
>> - .supply = "vbus_draw",
>> - },
>> - {
>> - .dev = &power_supply.dev,
>> - .supply = "ac_draw",
>> - },
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw", "gpio-vbus"),
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw", "pda-power"),
>
> How do you think about Mark's comments? Use dev_name() at here.
Hi Haojian,
I'm not sure I quite understand you. I'd looked up the
structs and got their respective value that would be
returned by dev_name(), which is what I thought was
requested of me.
Thanks,
Paul.
>> };
>>
>> static struct regulator_init_data bq24022_init_data = {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c
>> index 3d6baf9..1a18e63 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c
>> @@ -577,14 +577,8 @@ static struct platform_device power_supply = {
>> */
>>
>> static struct regulator_consumer_supply bq24022_consumers[] = {
>> - {
>> - .dev = &gpio_vbus.dev,
>> - .supply = "vbus_draw",
>> - },
>> - {
>> - .dev = &power_supply.dev,
>> - .supply = "ac_draw",
>> - },
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw", "gpio-vbus"),
>> + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw", "pda-power"),
>> };
>>
>> static struct regulator_init_data bq24022_init_data = {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
