On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:32:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, that's what you should do. Calling dev_name() is only possible if > > you have the struct device and removing the need for the struct device > > is exactly what we're trying to avoid here. > So what the hell is happening here to fix the breakage which the > regulator tree caused in mainline? From this thread, it looks like > it's been known about since 8th March which is now twenty days ago, > and it's still broken. Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
