From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
definition
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:17 +0000
Hi Russell,
Could you please pull the context switching patches for ARM, together
with a generic hook acked by PeterZ?
Thanks,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:48:03AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please check your mailbox:
> > > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:42:27 +0000
> > > > From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > > > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>,
> > > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > > Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>,
> > > > Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
> > > > scheduler hook
> > >
> > > Btw., are you losing emails? Because the reply from peterz to
> > > those patches, a month ago, was pretty clear:
> > >
> > > > > Russell, what's the status of these patches? I'd like to see
> > > > > them land in 3.4 if possible. I'm fine either way, I'll
> > > > >
> > > > > probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I can stack some
> > > > > other patches on top.
> > >
> > > You never replied to PeterZ's request, you just ignored this
> > > scheduler maintainer request and you just did it in some
> > > random way that was most convenient to you many weeks after
> > > the thread died down, ignoring everyone else's concerns - a
> > > pretty usual pattern from you I have to say.
> >
> > Sigh. You know, people communicate via other methods from
> > time to time. How the hell do you think PeterZ provided his
> > ack for the patch?
>
> He provided it via email to lkml:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/27/210
>
> But he asked *you* to do a proper Git space solution:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/16/232
>
> You *never* replied to that request that I can see, you just
> ignored it, why?
I talked to peterz by other means. He gave his ack after that message was
sent. He was fully aware of what was happening.
> This discussion shows that you seem to have basic reading
> comprehension problems.
And your a fucking idiot too. Go to hell Ingo and stop being an utter
prat.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
