* Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:48:03AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Please check your mailbox: > > > > > > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:42:27 +0000 > > > From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, > > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > > Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, > > > Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() > > > scheduler hook > > > > Btw., are you losing emails? Because the reply from peterz to > > those patches, a month ago, was pretty clear: > > > > > > Russell, what's the status of these patches? I'd like to see > > > > them land in 3.4 if possible. I'm fine either way, I'll > > > > > > > > probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I can stack some > > > > other patches on top. > > > > You never replied to PeterZ's request, you just ignored this > > scheduler maintainer request and you just did it in some > > random way that was most convenient to you many weeks after > > the thread died down, ignoring everyone else's concerns - a > > pretty usual pattern from you I have to say. > > Sigh. You know, people communicate via other methods from > time to time. How the hell do you think PeterZ provided his > ack for the patch? He provided it via email to lkml: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/27/210 But he asked *you* to do a proper Git space solution: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/16/232 You *never* replied to that request that I can see, you just ignored it, why? This discussion shows that you seem to have basic reading comprehension problems. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
