* Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please check your mailbox: > > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:42:27 +0000 > From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, > Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() > scheduler hook Btw., are you losing emails? Because the reply from peterz to those patches, a month ago, was pretty clear: > > Russell, what's the status of these patches? I'd like to see > > them land in 3.4 if possible. I'm fine either way, I'll > > > > probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I can stack some > > other patches on top. You never replied to PeterZ's request, you just ignored this scheduler maintainer request and you just did it in some random way that was most convenient to you many weeks after the thread died down, ignoring everyone else's concerns - a pretty usual pattern from you I have to say. Had you followed PeterZ's request this conflict in linux-next could have been avoided, amongst other things. Given that the merge window is close I doubt there will be other, more difficult to resolve conflicts, but this incident again demonstrates your inability to communicate efficiently and amicably, forcing me to highlight it in this trivial case because it's a sadly reoccuring pattern. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
