On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:23 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and > >>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no > >>> tree today. > >>> > >> What about github ? gitorious ? > >> > >> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk > >> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. > > > > Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next > > pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot > > of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next > > tree at best. Probably better to just wait. > > > That's just insane... > > git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development > should just not be impacted by such issues. Key word is "should," but reality intervenes. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
