On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >> tree today. >> > What about github ? gitorious ? > > If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk > usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next tree at best. Probably better to just wait. josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
