Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>> tree today. >>> >> What about github ? gitorious ? >> >> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. > > Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next > pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot > of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next > tree at best. Probably better to just wait. > That's just insane... git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development should just not be impacted by such issues. - Arnaud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
