On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:55:44PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:08 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > Hi Vinod,
>> > >
>> > > Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in
>> > > drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c (called drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c in the sleav-dma
>> > > tree) between commit 083be3f05371 ("spi/pl022: initialize burstsize from
>> > > FIFO trigger level") from Linus' tree and commit 001b0585ff16 ("Improve
>> > > slave/cyclic DMA engine documentation") from the slave-dma tree.
>> > >
>> > > I fixed it up (see below) anc acn carry the fix as necessary.
>> >
>> > The correct fix would be:
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > index eba88c7,99e7880..0000000
>> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > @@@ -910,11 -908,11 +910,9 @@@ static int configure_dma(struct pl022 *
>> > {
>> > struct dma_slave_config rx_conf = {
>> > .src_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
>> > + .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
>> > };
>> > struct dma_slave_config tx_conf = {
>> > .dst_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
>> > .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
>> > - .dst_maxburst = pl022->vendor->fifodepth >> 1,
>> > };
>> > unsigned int pages;
>> > int ret;
>> >
>> Grant, Russell,
>> Can you please ack this fix before I apply in my tree to resolve this conflict
>
> I don't see why I need to - my documentation patch should only be touching
> Documentation/dmaengine.txt, not drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c. So it really
> should not be causing a conflict in this file.
The commit includes 3 stray hunks not in the original patch. Sounds
like it got borked on commit.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
