Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:55:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c between commit
> d8850ba425d9823d3184bd52f065899dac4689f9 ("x86, UV: Fix the effect of
> extra bits in the hub nodeid register") from the tip tree and commit
> 0a3aee0da4402aa19b66e458038533c896fb80c6 ("x86: Use this_cpu_ops to
> optimize code") from the percpu tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thank you.  Looks good to me.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux