linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/process.c between commit
25e41933b58777f2d020c3b0186b430ea004ec28 ("perf: Clean up power events by
introducing new, more generic ones") from the tip tree and commit
7b543a5334ff4ea2e3ad3b777fc23cdb8072a988 ("x86: Replace uses of
current_cpu_data with this_cpu ops") from the percpu tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index c852041,dae1c07..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@@ -444,9 -444,8 +444,9 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait)
  void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long ax, unsigned long cx)
  {
  	trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, (ax>>4)+1, smp_processor_id());
 +	trace_cpu_idle((ax>>4)+1, smp_processor_id());
  	if (!need_resched()) {
- 		if (cpu_has(&current_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
+ 		if (cpu_has(__this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_info), X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
  			clflush((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags);
  
  		__monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
@@@ -461,8 -460,7 +461,8 @@@ static void mwait_idle(void
  {
  	if (!need_resched()) {
  		trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, smp_processor_id());
 +		trace_cpu_idle(1, smp_processor_id());
- 		if (cpu_has(&current_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
+ 		if (cpu_has(__this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_info), X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
  			clflush((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags);
  
  		__monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html